With apologies to William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, (1534) a "rose by any other name would smell as sweet," the name of high tech products can matter a great deal. More so the closer you get to consumers where branding are key. Naming selection and even branding strategy can have huge effect on the efficiency and effectiveness of your promotional budget.
In my experience, www.brockmann.com the development of effective naming and branding strategies is getting harder and harder to develop and nurture. That's because the marketplace for ideas is an increasingly crowded domain, and with the instant information gratification services of the Internet and a good search engine, we can be instantly aware of others using the same or slightly variant names. Software technologies in particular are easily reverse engineered. And dozens of smart people around the world are presented with exactly the same market trend information at the same time, so there are fewer instances of truly unique ideas. Innovation leads are reduced to months and weeks.
All of this instantly available information means that some product naming strategies are harder and more expensive to implement than others.
The most popular strategy is those where the equity of the product name flows to the 'master brand.' A master brand is usually the brand of the corporation - Cisco, HP, IBM, 3Com. This way corporate marketers can create and nurture value around the master brand, where it is supposed to stand for something. Something is usually attributes like - innovation, quality, agility.
In this strategy, a good product name is the product category and is usually followed by a model number or some designator differentiating the elements inside the product category. So, a Nortel Multimedia Communications Server 5100 for example, fits this strategy since the Nortel is the master brand, MCS is the category and the 5100 is a size/market designator. Also, here the corporate marketer reigns supreme. They have the advertising budget to push their overarching brand, and the product marketer is left with reminding buyers that BRAND has the CATEGORY. Many times, it is important in the multi-product company to pick favorites (hopefully tied to high growth and as the embodiment of the master brand attributes) and put a lot of wood behind that arrow. Five years ago, Apple advertised almost exclusively the iPod and only in the past 18 months has been making a big deal about the Mac computers. HP is making a big deal about the PC being personal again.
The argument is that focused branding behind one product line raises the profile of the brand (lifting all boats as it were) and at the same time promotes the innovative new product.
Alternatively, companies can create brands around a specific product. There are two problems here. Firstly, what is the multi-cultural name that points to the benefit of the product? Secondly, how can that new brand be nurtured and grow within the great background noise of the marketplace? Good examples of this are iSpeedbump and PhoneFactor to name two hot new products that fit this discrete brand naming strategy. iSpeedbump is an appliance that improves VoIP quality by buffering other Internet traffic to let VoIP traverse narrow access links. PhoneFactor is a free 2-factor user authentication service that uses your phone to confirm user credentials at login.
Both of these products are independently named from their creators. Both have discrete websites. Both launched their capabilities at the Las Vegas Interop 2007 show. What tips would you give these marketers on getting their product brands going?
Peter Brockmann is a high tech industry analyst and consultant. Learn more about Brockmann & Company.
Recent Comments